Credited from: CHANNELNEWSASIA
The Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague ruled on August 31 that India must uphold its obligations under the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan, which India suspended last year amid escalating tensions following a terrorist attack in Kashmir. The court stated that the Indus Waters Treaty remains fully in force and that India lacked justification for its actions. The treaty plays a crucial role, ensuring water supply to about 80% of agricultural lands in Pakistan, emphasizing its long-standing significance despite historical conflicts between the nations, according to Reuters, South China Morning Post, Channel News Asia, and Al Jazeera.
Following the court's ruling, India announced its categorical rejection of the verdict, asserting that the Permanent Court of Arbitration has no jurisdiction over its sovereign decisions regarding security and hydroelectric projects. The Indian Ministry of External Affairs emphasized that the court's findings would have no bearing on India's actions, stating, "This so-called Court of Arbitration has no jurisdiction whatsoever to pronounce on India’s sovereign decisions," according to Reuters, South China Morning Post, and Channel News Asia.
The tribunal also ordered India to limit construction on the Ratle Hydro-Electric Plant, prohibiting any work above certain levels until a decision by a neutral expert appointed by the World Bank is delivered, expected by July 2027. This measure is intended to ensure compliance with the treaty while addressing Pakistan's concerns over unilateral decisions by India to alter water flow, highlighting the treaty’s ongoing relevance and the significance of maintaining diplomatic water-sharing relations, as noted by Channel News Asia and Al Jazeera.
In response, Pakistan expressed satisfaction with the tribunal's decision, asserting that it upholds the legal binding nature of the treaty. Pakistani officials stated that the verdict vindicates their long-standing position that the Indus Waters Treaty cannot be unilaterally suspended or disregarded, reflecting a commitment to protect its legal rights under the treaty, according to South China Morning Post and Al Jazeera.