The recent comments from former national security adviser Robert O’Brien during an interview have reignited discussions about the U.S. potentially acquiring Greenland. This move is both controversial and strategically viewed through the lens of climate change and national security, as O’Brien emphasized its importance as temperatures rise.

O’Brien remarked that Greenland serves as a “highway from the Arctic all the way to North America,” making it crucial for U.S. interests as competition grows in the Arctic. He stated during an appearance on Fox News’s “Sunday Morning Futures” that the land could become a major international pathway as traditional routes become less viable due to climate change.

In defending the idea of U.S. ownership, O’Brien highlighted that the territory could be pivotal in countering Russian and Chinese activities in the increasingly accessible Arctic region. He quoted former President Trump, clarifying that if Denmark cannot protect Greenland, “we’ll buy it and we’ll defend it,” pointing out the necessity for the U.S. to develop its resources while safeguarding the area [The Daily Beast].

O’Brien emphasized that “the Kingdom of Denmark owns Greenland, and they have got an obligation to defend it.” He underscored the urgency of this proposal, noting that “if they can’t defend it, we’re going to have to, and we’re not going to do it for free.” His comments have sparked considerable debate, with critics questioning the ethical implications of such territorial aspirations, especially under the guise of climate change acknowledgment.

Greenland’s Prime Minister Múte Eged has responded firmly against these proposals, stating emphatically, “Greenland is ours. We are not for sale and will never be for sale,” affirming the island’s autonomy and right to self-determination. Denmark has also reiterated its commitment to ensuring Greenland's security while announcing new measures to bolster its presence in the Arctic.

This renewed interest in Greenland has reawakened discussions on sovereignty, climate action, and the geopolitical landscape as the Arctic becomes the focal point of international strategy [The Hill].