Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) informed House Republicans at a policy retreat on Saturday that President-elect Donald Trump advocates for a singular, substantial reconciliation package, rather than the two-package strategy favored by some GOP members. According to multiple sources present during the closed-door meeting at Fort McNair, Johnson quoted Trump as wanting to pass "one big, beautiful bill" as they prepare for a legislative agenda focused on taxes, security, and energy initiatives (The Hill).

Trump's stance notably contrasts with that of Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.), who has proposed a two-package plan, the first addressing border security and defense and the second focusing on extending the Trump-era tax cuts, which are set to expire at the end of 2025. This division within the Republican ranks reflects the challenges the party faces as it prepares to leverage its trifecta control of the White House and Congress arising from the upcoming 2024 election, allowing for major legislative actions through the budget reconciliation process that requires only a simple majority to pass.

The House Freedom Caucus, a group of conservative lawmakers, has endorsed Thune’s two-pronged approach. In recent statements, Chairman Andy Harris (R-Md.) reiterated support for splitting the package, emphasizing the need for immediate funding to fortify border security and expedite the deportation process for criminal aliens. "The first piece, a very small border piece," said Harris during an interview, stressing the urgency of the border funding (ABC News).

Johnson’s preference for a consolidated approach may lead to dissent among House Republicans, particularly as the GOP maintains a fragile majority of 219 members against 215 Democrats. Challenging party unity, a reconciliation package aligned with Trump's preference could test the cohesion of the GOP as legislators strive to enact significant reforms without bipartisan support.

As the party gears up for this pivotal period, the divergent strategies illustrate an ongoing debate about how best to fulfill Republican priorities in the new session of Congress.