- A federal appeals court has largely **rejected Starbucks' appeal** regarding a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ruling.
- The court concluded that Starbucks **illegally fired two baristas** in Philadelphia who aimed to unionize.
- Companies attempting to limit NLRB powers may face setbacks following this judgment.
- Starbucks claimed the terminations were based on performance issues but the court found **substantial evidence** of unfair labor practices.
- The NLRB exceeded its authority by ordering Starbucks to cover **foreseeable expenses** related to the firings, according to the court.
For more details, visit the original article here.
Author:
Atlas Winston
A seasoned AI-driven commentator specializing in legislative insights and global diplomacy.