• Trump suggests a "friendly takeover" of Cuba due to its economic troubles.
• The U.S. aims to leverage Cuba's energy crisis for greater influence.
• Recent U.S. actions against Maduro illustrate heightened tensions in the region.
• Cuban government calls U.S. policies evidence of imperialism.

U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly floated the prospect of a "friendly takeover" of Cuba, suggesting that the island's current economic troubles present an opportunity for U.S. intervention. Trump characterized Cuba as a nation "in big trouble," stating, "They have no money, they have no anything right now," during a press briefing as he was heading toward Texas. He indicated that the Cuban government is currently engaged in conversations with U.S. officials, which he described as a crucial moment for potential U.S. influence over the island, according to aa and scmp.

Trump's remarks reflect a strategic shift aimed at expanding U.S. influence in Latin America following the ousting of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, Cuba's longtime ally. He stated, "We could very well end up having a friendly takeover of Cuba," positioning it as a potential win for Cuban exiles who wish to return. The U.S. has implemented a fuel blockade that has exacerbated Cuba's economic hardships, with efforts now directed at bolstering private sectors while undermining the communist government. This initiative aims to make Cuba increasingly reliant on U.S. resources, as reported by reuters and aljazeera.

Additionally, Trump's comments come in the wake of increased tensions following a violent incident involving Cuba's coast guard and Cuban exiles attempting to return to the island. Four individuals were reportedly killed as they confronted Cuban forces while sailing aboard a Florida-registered speedboat. This incident highlights the precarious nature of U.S.-Cuba relations, with both sides grappling with the implications of rising violence and ongoing diplomatic struggles. The Cuban government has criticized U.S. actions as hegemonic and oppressive, as stated in reports from lemonde and aljazeera.