• The White House has announced a new "technocratic" committee to govern Gaza.
• Dr. Ali Sha’ath will lead the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG).
• Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu criticizes the governing body's composition as uncoordinated.
• The ongoing Gaza ceasefire plan includes international security measures and reconstruction efforts.
• The situation has sparked tensions between the US and Israel, particularly regarding Turkish involvement.

The White House has announced the establishment of a new "technocratic" committee to oversee governance in the Gaza Strip following the ceasefire. This new body, called the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza (NCAG), will be headed by Dr. Ali Sha’ath, a former deputy minister in the Palestinian Authority. The White House characterized Sha’ath as a “widely respected technocratic leader” responsible for restoring public services and laying the groundwork for long-term governance in Gaza, according to aa.

Accompanying the NCAG, the White House also introduced the "Board of Peace,” chaired by President Trump, featuring several influential members including Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. This structure is designed to facilitate governance and recovery efforts in Gaza, as the region has been severely impacted by the ongoing conflict, which has resulted in extensive casualties and destruction, according to aa and reuters.

However, this announcement has not come without controversy. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed strong reservations about the board's composition, indicating that it was not coordinated with Israel and contradicts Israeli policy. This critique focuses particularly on the involvement of Turkish officials, which is a point of contention given the historical tensions between Israel and Turkey. Netanyahu has instructed Foreign Minister Gideon Saar to address these concerns directly with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, stating that the Israeli government was dissatisfied with the lack of communication regarding the board's formation, according to indiatimes and reuters.

The overarching plan includes a phased approach to stabilize Gaza, which necessitates disarming Hamas and establishing an international stabilization force. This initiative has drawn criticism from various Palestinian factions who feel that the ceasefire terms do not adequately address their concerns. Since the onset of the ceasefire, significant casualties have been reported within Gaza, and there are ongoing calls for greater humanitarian access, highlighting the complexity of the situation that these new governance bodies are meant to address, according to aa and indiatimes.