Credited from: CHANNELNEWSASIA
Meta Platforms has complied with Australia's new law prohibiting users under the age of 16 from maintaining social media accounts, blocking a total of **544,052** accounts within the first week of enforcement. This includes approximately **330,639** accounts on Instagram, **173,497** on Facebook, and **39,916** on Threads. The law took effect on December 10, 2022, marking Australia as the first country to implement such a comprehensive ban aimed at protecting minors from potential online harms, according to Channel News Asia, BBC, South China Morning Post, and India Times.
Meta's response to the ban indicates a significant commitment to compliance, yet it has expressed concerns regarding the potential isolation of young people from online communities. The company advocates for alternative measures such as incentivizing the tech industry to develop better age-verification systems instead of enforcing blanket bans. This call for improved industry standards has been echoed by parents and experts who worry that the ban might push minors to less regulated platforms, according to Channel News Asia, BBC, and South China Morning Post.
This legislative action has gained widespread attention, with various governments observing its implications. The Australian approach differs from other countries that typically employ parental consent or enhanced safety measures rather than outright bans. Critics argue that underage users may find ways to bypass these restrictions, which raises questions about the enforcement's effectiveness, as highlighted in reports from Channel News Asia, BBC, and India Times.
According to Meta, the compliance process is multifaceted and evolving, with significant concerns remaining about the online age-verification standards. The company has urged governments to collaborate more closely with the industry to establish these standards in order to ensure a coherent approach toward protecting minors across various platforms. Following the implementation of the ban, there are already discussions concerning the possible need to include more platforms under similar restrictions in the future, as stated by South China Morning Post and India Times.