Federal judge blocks Trump's freeze on $10 billion in child and family aid - PRESS AI WORLD
PRESSAI
Recent Posts
side-post-image
side-post-image
Politics

Federal judge blocks Trump's freeze on $10 billion in child and family aid

share-iconPublished: Friday, January 09 share-iconUpdated: Saturday, January 10 comment-icon1 month ago
Federal judge blocks Trump's freeze on $10 billion in child and family aid

Credited from: INDIATIMES

  • A federal judge temporarily blocks Trump's funding freeze affecting five Democratic-led states.
  • The freeze targeted over $10 billion meant for child care and family assistance.
  • States argue the move is unconstitutional and punishes those led by Democrats.
  • The legal battle stems from fraud allegations made by the Trump administration.
  • The ruling protects vulnerable families relying on these funds during ongoing inquiries.

A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Trump administration from freezing over $10 billion in federal funds meant for child care and family assistance in five Democratic-led states: California, Colorado, Illinois, Minnesota, and New York. U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian's ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by these states shortly after the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced the funding freeze due to concerns over alleged fraud, which the states argued was unconstitutional, according to Indiatimes and Reuters.

The funding freeze was projected to cut off more than $7 billion from the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program and $2.4 billion from the Child Care Development Fund. It raised significant concerns among state officials and child-care providers regarding the financial impacts on low-income families. California Attorney General Rob Bonta described the freeze as "a cruel and illegal attempt" by the Trump administration to play politics, emphasizing that it would harm vulnerable communities, according to Los Angeles Times and CBS News.

The lawsuit highlights the contention that the freeze, stemming from allegations of fraud in social service programs, was a means of punishing states led by Democrats rather than a legitimate effort to address misuse of funds. HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. defended the actions, stating the states' refusal to cooperate justified the funding cut. However, the states countered that the administration's claims lacked substantiation and were merely a pretext to undermine their programs, according to Reuters, Los Angeles Times, and Indiatimes.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE:

nav-post-picture
nav-post-picture