• UN Security Council votes 13-0 to approve a US-drafted resolution for Gaza.
• The resolution establishes a transitional Board of Peace and an International Stabilization Force (ISF).
• The ISF will oversee demilitarization efforts and support humanitarian aid delivery.
• Russia and China abstained from the vote, citing concerns over Palestinian representation.
• Hamas and other factions condemned the resolution, viewing it as undermining Palestinian self-determination.

The UN Security Council approved a US-drafted resolution on November 17, 2025, endorsing President Donald Trump’s 20-point peace plan for Gaza. The plan aims to form a transitional Board of Peace and authorizes an International Stabilization Force (ISF) to oversee security and reconstruction in the war-torn region. The resolution passed with 13 votes in favor, while Russia and China abstained from the vote, according to channelnewsasia, africanews, and latimes.

The resolution provides a framework for the establishment of the ISF, which will be tasked with demilitarizing Gaza, securing border areas, and managing humanitarian aid, as stated by US Ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz. Post-vote, Waltz emphasized that the resolution signifies a significant step towards enabling stability and prosperity in Gaza, according to scmp and indiatimes.

Following the vote, Trump celebrated the decision as a monumental approval in UN history, claiming it would pave the way for further global peace. He proposed that the Board of Peace would oversee governance in Gaza, which is set to continue until December 31, 2027, as noted in sources from middleeasteye and lemonde.

Despite widespread acclaim, the resolution faced backlash from Hamas and other Palestinian factions, which argued that it undermines their national rights and imposes external control over Gaza. They rejected the notion of demilitarization and expressed concerns about foreign intervention in their governance, according to aljazeera and aljazeera.

The resolution's language regarding a potential Palestinian state has been criticized for being vague and lacking firm commitments, a point emphasized by both Russian and Chinese diplomats who abstained from the vote due to concerns about the absence of Palestinian representation in the discussions, as reported by thejakartapost and abcnews.

In the aftermath of the resolution, reactions from various nations have been mixed, with some expressing hopes for eventual peace, while others remain skeptical about the international community's involvement in Gaza's rehabilitation, further complicating the ongoing conflict, according to channelnewsasia and aljazeera.