Credited from: ABCNEWS
US President Donald Trump has confirmed the full demolition of the East Wing of the White House as part of his plan to build a ballroom, with the total cost of the project now estimated at $300 million. Initially, Trump had stated the project would not impact the existing structure, but he later explained that the East Wing needed to be entirely removed to execute his vision for a new 90,000-square-foot ballroom capable of hosting large events, such as state dinners, without relying on temporary tents on the South Lawn, according to scmp and huffpost.
Demolition workers have completed the destruction of the East Wing, which housed vital facilities for first ladies and various official functions. The site has been transformed into rubble, raising concerns among preservationists. The National Trust for Historic Preservation, in a recent correspondence, urged the administration to pause the project for a public review, emphasizing fears that the new construction may overshadow the White House, according to latimes and npr.
Despite the ongoing controversy, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt defended the demolition, stating it followed a legal opinion suggesting that only vertical construction requires approval. This assertion has fuelled debates regarding the legality of bypassing established protocols meant to protect Washington's architectural integrity, as indicated by abcnews and cbsnews.
Trump's project has drawn significant funding, estimated at up to $350 million from private donors, including major corporations like Amazon, Google, and Lockheed Martin. This funding approach raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest, especially as Trump has intertwined personal finances with governmental projects, according to thejakartapost and abcnews.
As the President promotes the ballroom as a necessary modernization of the White House, the demolition and subsequent construction project continue to be accompanied by scrutiny over the prioritization of development over historical preservation. Former officials have cited possible procedural breaches, and critics have pointed out that a thorough consultation process should have been followed, highlighting the historical significance of the East Wing, as reported by huffpost and scmp.