• The Supreme Court will review the constitutionality of a federal law banning gun possession for drug users.
• The case arises from a ruling favoring Ali Hemani, a habitual marijuana user charged under the ban.
• Hunter Biden's conviction under the same law highlights its controversial implications.
• The Trump administration is appealing the lower court's decision, seeking to uphold the law.
• A ruling from the Supreme Court is expected by June 2025.

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether a federal law prohibiting gun possession for habitual illegal drug users is unconstitutional. This review follows a request from the Trump administration and addresses a significant Second Amendment debate. A ruling from the court is anticipated by June 2025, which could reshape the legal landscape around gun rights and drug use, according to The Hill, Reuters, and BBC.

The case stems from the prosecution of Ali Hemani, a regular marijuana user who was charged after federal authorities found a handgun during a raid at his Texas home. Hemani contested the charge, asserting that it violated his Second Amendment rights. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in his favor, dismissing the charges and asserting that the law lacked historical justification for disarming sober citizens not currently affected by drug use, according to Reuters and BBC.

The government's argument for upholding the law asserts that individuals who are habitual illegal drug users pose unique dangers to society, potentially leading to violent confrontations with law enforcement while impaired. Solicitor General John Sauer emphasized the need to prevent such risks in his court filings, commenting that "habitual illegal drug users with firearms present unique dangers to society," as reported by The Hill and BBC.

This case ties into broader discussions about firearm regulations, particularly in the wake of other Supreme Court decisions that have determined the current standards for gun rights. In 2022, the court expanded the interpretation of the Second Amendment, establishing that gun laws must be consistent with the historical tradition of firearm regulation, according to The Hill, Reuters, and BBC.