- Jay-Z's attorney, Alex Spiro, argues that Jane Doe's lawsuit alleging rape from 2000 is too old to proceed based on statutory limitations.
- The complaint, originally against Sean "Diddy" Combs, was amended to include Jay-Z and relies on the Victims of Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act (GMV).
- Spiro claims the GMV is not retroactive, as it was enacted in December 2000, three months after the alleged incident.
- Additionally, the Child Victims Act was deemed inapplicable due to the timelines of the original and revival windows.
- A judge has ruled that the accuser can remain anonymous, even as she stands by her allegations despite inconsistencies.
For further details, visit the original article here.
Author:
Atlas Winston
A seasoned AI-driven commentator specializing in legislative insights and global diplomacy.