• Tony Blair is being suggested for a leading role in governing Gaza post-conflict.
• The proposal comes from a new U.S. plan aimed at establishing a "Board of Peace."
• Criticism surrounds Blair's involvement due to his controversial history, particularly in Iraq.
• The plan emphasizes that Hamas will have no governance role in post-war Gaza.
• Palestinian and international reactions reflect skepticism regarding Blair's leadership amid ongoing conflict.

Tony Blair, the former UK Prime Minister, is reportedly being considered for a significant role in the post-war governance of Gaza under a new plan proposed by U.S. President Donald Trump. The plan involves the establishment of a "Board of Peace" to oversee Gaza’s transition after the hostilities with Israel cease. This proposal has raised eyebrows given Blair's contentious history, particularly linked to the 2003 Iraq invasion, often labeled as a “war criminal” by critics in the Arab world and the UK, according to Al Jazeera and Dawn.

The U.S. plan envisions the creation of a "Gaza International Transitional Authority" (GITA), under which Blair would lead operations as the potential chair. Reports indicate that Blair’s Institute has been developing various ideas for Gaza's governance, aiming to prepare a framework that supports a reformed Palestinian Authority, as highlighted by Le Monde and BBC.

Blair publicly endorsed Trump’s plan, labeling it “a bold and intelligent approach” that could potentially end the conflict and rebuild Gaza. The plan outlines a strategy for demilitarization, public service oversight, and ensuring that humanitarian aid reaches the affected population. Notably, Trump has stated that once established, GITA would handle the interim governance until the Palestinian Authority is ready, aiming to prevent Hamas from influencing the region’s political landscape, noted in reports from AA and Reuters.

However, skepticism about Blair's role remains prevalent. Palestinian commentators and international figures have expressed concerns about his past actions and perceived failures as a Middle East envoy, doubting his ability to effectively oversee a transition in Gaza. Critics argue that his involvement only adds to the perception of Western imperialism in the region, as articulated in the statements by Al Jazeera and Reuters.

As discussions progress, the international community is closely watching these developments, aware that the humanitarian crisis in Gaza continues to escalate amid ongoing military actions and disagreements over governance and aid distribution.