• Apple requests the EU to repeal the Digital Markets Act (DMA), citing user experience issues.
• The tech giant claims the DMA has delayed the rollout of important features for EU customers.
• Brussels argues the DMA is vital to creating a fairer digital marketplace.
• Apple faces significant fines under the DMA, including a recent €500 million penalty.
• The call for repeal aligns with Trump’s renewed pressure on the EU regarding Big Tech regulations.

In a significant move, Apple has formally requested the European Union to repeal its Digital Markets Act (DMA), asserting that the law jeopardizes user security and results in a "worse experience" for consumers. Apple claims the DMA has impeded its ability to deliver seamless experiences across its devices, a foundational aspect of its ecosystem, emphasizing that existing regulations are not fit for purpose. This request marks another chapter in the ongoing conflict between the tech giant and EU regulators, who are focused on ensuring fairness in the digital marketplace, according to thejakartapost, Reuters, bangkokpost, and dawn.

Apple argues that the DMA has forced it to delay key features for its products in the EU, including "Live Translation" capabilities that are already available in the United States. The company indicated that these delays stem from the need to conform to regulations mandating compatibility with non-Apple apps and devices. Such regulatory requirements were cited as detriments to its operational efficiency and product rollout timeline, according to thejakartapost, Reuters, bangkokpost, and dawn.

The stipulations of the DMA include requirements for companies like Apple to ensure their services are compatible with rival platforms, which Apple contends disrupts its exclusive ecosystem. Moreover, the DMA enforces penalties for non-compliance, evidenced by a recent €500 million fine levied against Apple, adding further pressure on the company. In its formal response, Apple has called for DMA enforcement to be reassigned to an independent body rather than the current regulatory framework, viewing this as essential for adequate oversight and compliance, as per thejakartapost, Reuters, bangkokpost, and dawn.