Sex strikes gained traction post-Trump’s election, linking to women's activism from South Korea, but extend beyond their literal meaning.
The initiative reflects women's fear over reproductive rights post Roe v. Wade repeal, highlighting a lack of choice amid a perceived fertility crisis.
Critics argue that framing sex as labor supports the patriarchal view that has long undermined women's autonomy.
True radical activism should aim for separatism and community strength, not merely a withdrawal from sexual relationships.
Pushing for worker strikes might be a more effective form of protest than sex strikes, focusing on challenging systemic patriarchy.