Credited from: TRTGLOBAL
The U.S. State Department has terminated press officer Shahed Ghoreishi following internal disputes regarding statements about Israeli-Palestinian affairs, particularly concerning Gaza. Reports indicate that Ghoreishi's termination was, in part, a response to his draft language that stated the U.S. does not support the forced relocation of Palestinians. This line was met with opposition from senior officials, including those at the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem, leading to increased tensions within the department, according to trtglobal, HuffPost, Anadolu Agency, and South China Morning Post.
Ghoreishi, an Iranian American, claimed that his dismissal was influenced by complaints from the embassy and that his loyalty to Trump administration policies was questioned. In a statement, he noted that his position was undermined after he advocated for a statement reflecting precedents set by higher officials on discarding the forced displacement narrative. The rejection of his proposed line raised questions about the U.S. foreign policy direction, indicative of a troubling trend toward unyielding support for Israel, as mentioned in reports from trtglobal, HuffPost, and Anadolu Agency.
His case was further complicated by right-wing activist Laura Loomer's involvement, as she publicly accused Ghoreishi of being unsupportive of the administration and affiliated with pro-Iran groups—a claim Ghoreishi vehemently denies. Following Loomer's claims, the State Department announced a temporary halt on all visitor visas for people from Gaza, a move that came shortly after her criticisms went viral, as reported by South China Morning Post and HuffPost.
The internal conflict surrounding Ghoreishi is said to reflect a broader pattern within the Trump administration, which has sought to enforce stringent adherence to its agenda regarding Israel. The firing follows the recent revocation of security clearances for 37 officials who had previously voiced dissent against Trump policies. Ghoreishi expressed concern about the implications of these actions for the future of U.S. foreign policy, stating, “the future looks bleak,” based on the current trajectory of leadership priorities, according to sources including Anadolu Agency and trtglobal.