Credited from: NEWSWEEK
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) made adjustments to the outflows of an Ohio lake to accommodate U.S. Vice President JD Vance's family boating trip, which coincided with his 41st birthday. The modifications were initiated upon the request of the Secret Service, aimed at ensuring "safe navigation" for Vance's security detail during their excursion on the Little Miami River, as reported by The Guardian and confirmed by statements from Newsweek and HuffPost.
During the adjustment period in early August, records indicated a significant rise in river levels and a corresponding decrease in lake elevation, which some sources suggest was aimed at providing optimal kayaking conditions for Vance and his family. An anonymous source mentioned that such "special releases" for personal recreation are rarely granted, stirring concerns about the precedent set for public resource use, according to Indiatimes, Newsweek, and HuffPost.
The Secret Service confirmed they coordinated with USACE and local authorities to facilitate safe watercraft operations but did not divulge operational specifics. Gene Pawlik, a USACE spokesperson, noted the adjustments were in line with operational protocols and that stakeholders downstream had been notified prior to the increase in outflows on August 1, 2025, ensuring there were no adverse effects on water levels, according to Newsweek and HuffPost.
Ethics experts have raised alarms regarding the implications of this incident. Former White House ethics lawyer Richard Painter condemned the action, claiming that it is "outrageous" for public resources to be used for a government official's leisure amid budget cuts that have impacted public services. Norm Eisen, another ethics expert, echoed these concerns, suggesting that such actions create an appearance of special treatment for those in power, highlighting a disparity in resource accessibility for the average citizen, as articulated by Indiatimes, Newsweek, and HuffPost.
While no formal allegations of wrongdoing have been made against Vance, the situation has sparked broader conversations about the ethics of using public infrastructures for personal benefits in light of shrinking public resources and services, illuminating issues of fairness and governance prevalent in today's political landscape.