Credited from: CHANNELNEWSASIA
In a significant escalation of trade tensions, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva announced that Brazil will implement retaliatory tariffs if U.S. President Donald Trump follows through on his pledge to impose a 50% tariff on all Brazilian imports, effective August 1. Lula emphasized that Brazil is a "sovereign nation" and warned that negotiations will dictate the country's response, stating, "If he charges 50% from us, we will charge 50% from them," highlighting Brazil's new Economic Reciprocity Law that allows for such actions, according to HuffPost and BBC.
In parallel, Trump announced a 35% tariff on imports from Canada set to take effect from August 1, accusing Canada of failing to combat fentanyl trafficking. This marks an increase from the previous 25% tariff, which had already targeted Canadian goods in Trump's ongoing trade war. Prime Minister Mark Carney has pledged to defend Canadian workers and businesses, asserting the government will continue negotiations to mitigate the economic fallout. Carney remarked that "throughout the current trade negotiations with the United States, the Canadian government has steadfastly defended our workers and businesses," as reported by Aljazeera and ABC News.
The economic implications of such steep tariffs pose a dual threat: they may derail ongoing trade negotiations between the U.S. and both Brazil and Canada. Despite mounting pressure, Brazilian officials assert that the impact of tariffs on overall economic growth for the year remains limited, with estimates around 2.5%. Lula's administration is exploring other potential markets to alleviate the pressure from reduced exports to the U.S., according to Reuters.
Trump's trade tactics have raised eyebrows, particularly his motivations for implementing tariffs on Brazil, where the political dynamics surrounding former President Jair Bolsonaro's legal challenges closely intertwine with these economic decisions. As Trump publicly defends Bolsonaro, analysts caution that these tariff threats may not align with traditional economic rationale and instead reflect a deeper engagement in international politics, as noted by Aljazeera and HuffPost.