Credited from: AA
Amid rising tensions following recent strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, US officials, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, emphasized they have no intelligence evidence that Iran moved any enriched uranium before the military action. Hegseth stated, "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be," reinforcing doubts about conflicting reports of uranium relocation, according to India Times and Channel News Asia.
Contradictory claims emerged, with reports suggesting that Iran might have moved approximately 400 kilograms of enriched uranium to undisclosed sites in anticipation of the US strikes. Satellite imagery captured unusual vehicle activity at the Fordow facility days before the strikes, leading experts to speculate on potential evacuations of nuclear materials, as noted by Newsweek and Dawn.
President Trump echoed this sentiment, claiming that moving such material would have been "too dangerous and very heavy and hard to move." He insisted that "nothing was taken out of the facility" at Fordow, contradicting suggestions of a significant preemptive relocation, according to India Times and TRT Global.
The mixed reports about the effectiveness of the strikes have led to heightened scrutiny of both the US operation and Iran's nuclear capabilities. An initial intelligence report suggested that the assaults had only set back Iran's nuclear ambitions by a few months, leading Hegseth to criticize media reports questioning the success of the operation, as reported by Reuters and SCMP.
As the situation develops, the fate of Iran's enriched uranium stockpile remains uncertain. Reports suggest it is feasible for Iran to have relocated some material, leading to calls for renewed dialogue to clarify the status of their nuclear stockpile. This context is further complicated by statements from Iranian leaders claiming that the strikes have not significantly hampered their nuclear program, noted by AA and AA.