Credited from: CBSNEWS
President Donald Trump's recent pardons and clemencies have allowed recipients to avoid paying more than $1.3 billion in restitution and fines, according to a review by Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee. The pardons include both those convicted in connection with the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack and numerous political allies and donors. The report states that Trump has “used his clemency powers to take an estimated $1.3 billion away from victims and survivors of crime,” facilitating further profit from their criminal actions, according to HuffPost, CBS News, and The Hill.
The financial breakdown reveals that individuals convicted for the January 6th riot had only paid 15% of the ordered $3 million in restitution prior to their pardons, meaning $2.6 million in obligations were canceled. Most of the escaped restitution comes from white-collar offenders. For instance, the report mentions Trevor Milton, founder of Nikola, whose restitution amount was estimated at $676 million but was unresolved at the time of his pardon. This trend showcases a significant departure from the traditional expectation that pardon-seekers demonstrate responsibility and make restitution to their victims, according to HuffPost, CBS News, and The Hill.
High-profile cases include that of Todd Chrisley, who was pardoned after a 12-year sentence for fraud and who owed nearly $17.7 million in restitution. The ongoing patterns of Trump’s clemency are critiqued for allowing individuals to sidestep their financial responsibilities to victims, further compounding impacts on taxpayers who now face bills for the damages caused by the rioters. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields countered by stating that Trump is correcting perceived political abuses within the judiciary, according to HuffPost, CBS News, and The Hill.
The ramifications extend beyond financial losses, as the report details how Trump's clemency actions undermine the entire structure surrounding presidential pardons and the associated principles of justice. The absence of required restitution payments opens a precedent that could diminish accountability for future criminal conduct. This ongoing controversy also includes individuals who are now seeking financial reimbursements citing their pardons, raising ethical questions about the application of justice in these cases, as highlighted in the findings from HuffPost, CBS News, and The Hill.