• The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to revoke humanitarian parole for over 500,000 migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela.
• This ruling poses a risk of deportation for nearly 1 million individuals as related protection programs are also affected.
• Liberal Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor dissented, emphasizing the devastating impacts on affected migrants.
• The decision follows a series of emergency appeals by the Trump administration aimed at overturning Biden-era immigration policies.
• Advocates have condemned this as potentially the largest mass illegalization event in modern American history.

The US Supreme Court ruled on May 30 that the Trump administration can revoke the temporary legal status of over 500,000 migrants who were granted humanitarian parole under Joe Biden's administration. This program, aimed at migrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, was intended to offer temporary protection due to ongoing political and economic crises in their home countries. The ruling exposes these individuals to potential rapid deportation while legal challenges proceed in lower courts, according to nytimes and reuters.

The decision overturned a lower court's order that had blocked the administration's efforts to end this welfare program. The ruling means that approximately 530,000 migrants, who had entered the US legally under this program, now face the risk of being deported without the protections previously afforded under the humanitarian parole policy. These changes are part of a broader effort by the administration to dismantle immigration policies set forth by Biden, with this case representing a significant shift towards stricter immigration enforcement, cites latimes and huffpost.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, along with Sonia Sotomayor, dissented, highlighting the devastating impacts this ruling could have, as it threatens the stability and livelihood of many migrants who relied on these protections. In dissent, Justice Jackson expressed that the court's decision undervalues the catastrophic repercussions for nearly half a million noncitizens who will face dire challenges while their legal cases are pending, reported newsweek and channelnewsasia.

This situation was compounded by a similar ruling earlier in May that allowed the administration to revoke Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for about 350,000 Venezuelan migrants, thus indicating a shift towards more aggressive immigration policy under Trump's directives. The Trump administration has heavily criticized Biden's use of humanitarian parole, claiming it constituted a lax enforcement of immigration laws and has sought to implement more stringent measures to curb illegal immigration, asserts bbc and lemonde.

In light of this decision, migration advocates warn about the essential human risks faced by migrants who may be sent back to countries further mired in instability and violence, potentially resulting in serious harm or death for those deported. Legal experts and advocates deem this policy shift historically significant, reflecting larger ongoing tensions within U.S. immigration policy and enforcement, according to trtglobal and aa.