Key Takeaways:

• A coalition including LULAC has filed a lawsuit against Trump's executive order for requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration.
• The order threatens to impact mail-in ballot deadlines, arguing states should not count ballots received post-Election Day.
• The lawsuit claims Trump's actions breach constitutional separations of power, asserting elections must be regulated by Congress and the states.

A coalition of advocacy groups, including the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), filed a lawsuit on Monday targeting President Trump's recent executive order, which mandates proof of citizenship for individuals registering to vote in federal elections. The lawsuit, also supported by the CBS News, asserts that Trump's actions overstep his presidential authority and challenge constitutional checks and balances.

According to The Hill, the lawsuit contends that the executive order requires the Election Assistance Commission to update the national mail voter registration form to include proof of citizenship, which could significantly undermine access to voting for many eligible citizens. The order also seeks to instruct the attorney general to penalize states that count absentee or mail-in ballots received after Election Day, a tactic that has faced legal scrutiny from multiple sides.

The groups contend that under the U.S. Constitution, the authority to set election rules resides with Congress and state governments, not the President. "The Order is an attack on the constitutionally mandated checks and balances that keep American elections free and fair," the lawsuit states, highlighting that the executive order would create hurdles for eligible voters, particularly affecting Latino communities. This sentiment is echoed in remarks by LULAC representatives, who warn that the citizenship proof requirement could disenfranchise vulnerable populations and disproportionately impact voters with less accessibility to identification.

Despite claiming widespread voter fraud, evidence indicates that incidences of noncitizen voting are exceedingly rare. Studies highlighted by ABC News found only a minimal number of suspected noncitizen voting cases among millions cast in previous elections. Trump's order follows a pattern of actions that critics assert undermine the integrity and accessibility of the voting process in the U.S., portraying it as a response to unfounded fears rather than an acknowledgment of existing electoral realities.

This legal challenge represents the latest in a series of struggles between the current administration and various organizations dedicated to upholding voter rights amid escalating concerns about election integrity and access. The impacts of Trump's executive order on voting rights are being closely monitored, as the outcome of this lawsuit may have significant implications for how federal and state elections are conducted in the future.