Credited from: BUSINESSINSIDER
The Trump administration has initiated drastic cuts to the Voice of America (VOA) and other government-funded media organizations, following the president's latest executive order aimed at minimizing the functions of several federal agencies. This move has led to the placement of virtually all of VOA's 1,300 staff members on paid administrative leave, a significant action that VOA director Michael Abramowitz noted is hurting the organization's operational capabilities for the first time in 83 years. According to a statement made by Abramowitz, “VOA promotes freedom and democracy around the world by telling America’s story and by providing objective and balanced news and information, especially for those living under tyranny.” The cuts follow President Trump's directive shortly after Congress passed a funding bill, mandating reductions in line with what is required by law. This included the U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM), which oversees several outlets including Radio Free Europe and Radio Free Asia. Trump's actions have drawn fierce criticism from various quarters, with advocacy group Reporters Without Borders stating that these cuts represent a departure from the historic role of the U.S. in promoting free information globally. Alongside the cuts to VOA, the order has also terminated funding for other programs, further exacerbating concerns regarding the spread of misinformation in authoritarian regimes. Critics fear that such drastic measures will gift propaganda victories to adversaries such as Russia and China, especially given the expansive reach of these media outlets, which combined serve an audience of about 427 million people. With the cancellation of federal grants for organizations like Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, leaders in media ethics express that without these platforms, the narrative surrounding U.S. policy and influence could be greatly hindered. Kari Lake, a senior advisor appointed by Trump, indicated the need for cost-saving measures but failed to address the potential impact on journalistic integrity and mission of VOA. These sweeping changes signal a tumultuous period for U.S. international broadcasting, with implications that could redefine the role of government-funded news agencies in the current geopolitical landscape. The extent of the cuts and their consequences remain a topic for ongoing debate, as press advocates and the public alike are urged to consider their impact on democracy and free speech.
Source: Los Angeles Times, Source: CBS News, Source: Times of India