Credited from: NEWSWEEK
In a significant escalation of military activity, Israel has conducted a series of airstrikes on southern Syria, targeting key military positions including a weapons storage facility in Qardaha, the hometown of former President Bashar al-Assad. This operation comes amidst a backdrop of increasing instability following the swift overthrow of Assad's regime in December 2025, which has left a power vacuum filled by conflicting interests from regional powers such as Turkey and various militant groups.
The Syrian state media reported that Israeli airstrikes were aimed at preventing potential threats from weapons that could fall into hostile hands, as Israel seeks to protect its northern borders. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) stated that they were enforcing a policy of securing the Golan Heights and southern regions, deeming it imperative to keep military assets away from factions they perceive as antagonistic to their national security. Despite these assertions, the ongoing strikes have drawn condemnation from Syrian officials and the international community, with calls for respecting Syria's sovereignty and territorial integrity made by multiple organizations, including the United Nations.
Amidst these tensions, a growing rivalry between Israel and Turkey has come to the forefront, leveraging their respective roles in the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East. As Israel intensifies its military efforts, Turkey has sought to strengthen its influence through relations with the Syrian opposition and maintaining its military presence in northern Syria. Concerns are mounting over Turkey’s ambitions in the aftermath of Assad’s fall, as the Kurdish-controlled regions and southern Syria become flashpoints for potential clashes between these U.S. allies. According to analysts, the Israel-Turkey dynamic could trigger a broader confrontation unless diplomatic efforts are prioritized to manage the escalating situation.
The newly formed Syrian government, led by interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa, is grappling with internal divisions and external threats, complicating efforts to establish a stable governance framework. Sharaa has attempted to navigate a nuanced position regarding military operations, rejecting a confrontational stance against Israel while also addressing the aspirations of various minority groups within Syria. His administration faces pressures not only from Israel but also from regional players like Turkey, which has been known to support certain factions opposed to both the Syrian government and its historical ties with Iran.
Critics argue that prolonged U.S. sanctions and inadequate engagement with Syria hinder any possibility of reconstruction and political stability, exacerbating the existing humanitarian crisis. With the economy in shambles and the nation battling the legacies of conflict, the failure to forge a cohesive path forward may revert Syria into chaos. Political economist Karam Shaar emphasizes that without significant international investment and support, “Syria teeters on the brink of chaos, with a potential surge in violence that might dwarf the hardships endured since 2011.”
As tensions boil over, the prospects for a peaceful resolution appear dim. Observers note that unless both Israel and Turkey can collectively recognize the detrimental impact of their escalating hostilities on the region, Syria may continue to serve as a battleground for competing interests, drawing in neighboring countries and international stakeholders alike. For more in-depth information, visit Al Jazeera, South China Morning Post, New York Times, and Newsweek.