WASHINGTON — The Trump administration's order to withdraw almost all staff from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has led to widespread frustration and anxiety as workers scramble to leave their overseas postings. This drastic measure is the culmination of over two weeks of changes that have significantly dismantled the core functions of the agency, which has been integral to American humanitarian efforts for 60 years.

USAID workers received notification to prepare for their departure, giving them 30 days to return home unless classified as essential personnel. The announcement was met with immediate backlash, prompting protests from supporters outside the Capitol, including lawmakers who describe the shuttering of USAID operations as akin to a coup. "This is illegal and this is a coup," exclaimed U.S. Rep. Sara Jacobs during the rally.

Much of the outrage stems from the feeling that the USAID shutdown compromises crucial foreign assistance missions, such as educational support and disease prevention programs which have saved millions globally. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, currently on a tour of Central America, attempted to shield the administration from blame, emphasizing the need to prioritize U.S. national interests in foreign aid delivery.

"Our preference would have been to do this in a more orderly fashion," Rubio conceded while acknowledging the need to reevaluate which missions would proceed in the future. The focus has turned toward how the remaining USAID structure can be retained amid fears that billions of dollars in projects could now come to an abrupt halt.

Countless aid workers faced immediate logistical nightmares as they prepared for abrupt relocations from their posts in over 100 countries, including war-torn regions where their safety is now unknown. A USAID contractor shared concerns about feeling abandoned, having been locked out of critical communication systems and left without immediate support.

“You really do feel cut off from a lifeline,” the contractor lamented. Meanwhile, hundreds of millions of dollars worth of humanitarian supplies remain stalled at ports due to the funding freeze.

Critics of the move argue that dismantling USAID threatens U.S. influence on the global stage, as other nations like China and Russia seek to fill the vacuum created by diminished American presence. Calls for congressional action against the administration's shifts in policy grow louder, as many assert that USAID is a legally protected independent agency that cannot simply be terminated without legislative oversight.

With health programs that have successfully combatted epidemics like HIV/AIDS and Ebola already halted, the fallout of this decision reverberates across continents. The fallout is likely to not only impact those directly involved with USAID but also the millions who rely on U.S. assistance. The situation remains dire as deadlines loom for the nearly 10,000 staffers navigating uncertainty in the field.

As the administration pushes for rapid changes in how foreign aid operates, it orders those deemed non-essential to leave, creating a chaotic environment for aid efforts worldwide while leaving a wide array of humanitarian achievements in peril.

For continuous updates, visit AP News.