Key points to note:

• Tulsi Gabbard's nomination for director of national intelligence cleared a Senate committee vote with a narrow 9-8 margin.
• The nomination is backed solely by Republicans, with all Democrats opposing due to Gabbard's past comments on Russia and her stance on Edward Snowden.
• Her previous meeting with Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and her contentious views have made her a divisive candidate.
• Gabbard must secure near-unanimous support from Republican senators in the full Senate vote, yet uncertainties remain.

Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as director of national intelligence is closer to gaining approval following a narrow 9-8 vote by the Senate Intelligence Committee, where all nine Republicans supported her while every Democrat opposed. The decision now allows her nomination to proceed to a full Senate vote, although a date for this vote has not yet been scheduled. Given the tight control of Republicans in the Senate, gaining near-unanimous support from her party will be critical for Gabbard's confirmation to the vital intelligence position.

Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii and one-time presidential candidate, has stirred controversy due to her past indicative remarks sympathetic to Russia, alongside her previous meeting with former Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad. Additionally, her defense of Edward Snowden, the whistleblower who leaked classified NSA documents, has stirred concerns among legislators from both sides of the aisle. Despite attempting to clarify her stance on Snowden by acknowledging that he "broke the law" yet highlighting his revelations about convoluted surveillance practices, Gabbard has faced intense scrutiny during her confirmation hearings.

After a contentious hearing, initial Republican support for Gabbard appeared uncertain, with some members questioning her lack of formal intelligence experience and her past criticisms of U.S. intelligence agencies. The tide shifted, however, when a pressure campaign led by Trump's allies, including prominent tech figure Elon Musk, effectively galvanized support among key Republican senators. For instance, Senator Todd Young, who had previously expressed critical views about her nomination, ultimately announced his backing after Gabbard provided written assurances regarding her commitment to accountability within the intelligence community.

Despite ground gained among Republican senators, opposition remains strong from Democrats. Notably, Senator Mark Kelly voiced concerns that Gabbard's tendency to embrace less-supported claims undermines the assessments of trusted intelligence sources. Meanwhile, other Democratic lawmakers categorically labeled her nomination as a potential risk to national security, citing her history of "echoing" contrary narratives.

As Gabbard's nomination progresses, the dynamics within the Senate are evident, with party-line polarization playing a critical role in the evaluation of her qualifications and past actions. Her pathway to confirmation remains precarious, particularly given the overarching concerns from Democratic senators alongside reservations among some Republicans.

For further details, visit the original articles from VOA News, Le Monde, Los Angeles Times, and India Times.