Credited from: REUTERS
In a dramatic turn of events, Phyllis Fong, the inspector general of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), was forcibly escorted from her office on January 29 after she refused to accept her dismissal by the Trump administration. Fong, a respected veteran with over 22 years of service, had made clear to colleagues her intention to remain in her position, claiming that the termination did not adhere to established legal protocols. In an email sent to her coworkers, which was later reviewed by Reuters, Fong stated that the independent Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency determined that the termination notices “do not comply with the requirements set out in law and therefore are not effective at this time.”
Despite her efforts, Fong was met with security agents who facilitated her exit from USDA headquarters after she arrived for work on that fateful Monday morning. The controversy surrounding her termination raised eyebrows, particularly as it coincided with broader firings: Fong was part of a group of 17 federal inspectors general released by the Trump administration in what has been characterized by critics as a "Friday-night purge." The White House later defended these actions, asserting that “rogue, partisan bureaucrats... have been relieved of their duties in order to make room for qualified individuals who will uphold the rule of law and protect Democracy.”
Fong has previously conducted investigations into various critical issues, including animal welfare violations tied to Elon Musk's Neuralink and several food safety audits. The USDA inspector general’s office has been pivotal in examining matters of consumer safety, particularly amidst ongoing concerns regarding bird flu outbreaks affecting livestock. Fong's dismissal raises significant questions not only about accountability within federal agencies but also about the potential implications for investigations already in progress.
For more details, visit Newsweek, The Guardian, or USA Today.