• Rep. Andy Ogles proposes revising the 22nd Amendment to allow President Trump a third term.
• The proposal includes a clause preventing Barack Obama and others from seeking a similar chance.
• Amending the Constitution requires a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate, a major hurdle.
• Social media reactions are varied, with many expressing skepticism about the amendment's potential.
• Previous attempts to challenge term limits face substantial political and legal obstacles.

In a controversial move, Republican Congressman Andy Ogles has introduced a resolution aiming to amend the U.S. Constitution, specifically the 22nd Amendment, to allow President Donald Trump and future presidents to serve a third term. Ogles has framed his proposal as a necessary step to ensure that the nation can benefit from what he describes as "bold leadership." The suggested amendment reads, "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than three times, nor be elected to any additional term after being elected to two consecutive terms."

This resolution has stirred significant reactions on social media, with some users humorously speculating about a future face-off between Trump and Barack Obama should the proposal come to fruition. One user compared it to bringing back winners for a "75th Hunger Games," while many others expressed skepticism about its viability. Critics have quickly pointed out that while Ogles' proposal would enable Trump to remain in office until he is 86, it explicitly prevents Obama, along with former presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, from seeking additional terms due to their already served consecutive terms.

The push for this amendment comes just days after Trump was inaugurated for a second, non-consecutive term, thus becoming only the second U.S. president to achieve this milestone. Political analysts highlight that amending the Constitution is a cumbersome process necessitating a two-thirds majority in both chambers of Congress and subsequent ratification by at least 38 states. Given the current political landscape, this is seen as "highly unlikely," as the Republicans maintain only a slim majority

Furthermore, critics of the proposal emphasize that the amendment faces substantial political opposition. For instance, Democrats have framed Trump's potential third term as a threat to democracy, arguing that it would perpetuate an alarming trend of authoritarianism. Reaction from the Democratic side has been uniformly critical; for example, New York Representative Dan Goldman expressed disbelief at how such proposals gain traction among GOP members.

Despite Ogles' enthusiastic support, experts predict that the likelihood of the proposed changes materializing remains extremely low. Indeed, the 22nd Amendment, ratified in 1951 after Franklin D. Roosevelt's unprecedented four terms, serves to protect against abuses of power, thus making the initial purpose of this proposed amendment contentious. Opponents argue it undermines the fundamental democratic principles and expectations regarding presidential term limits.

In summary, while the proposal has invigorated discussion around presidential tenure, the road to a successful amendment remains fraught with legal and political challenges. For a deeper understanding of the implications of this proposed amendment and the constitutional landscape surrounding it, refer to the Forbes analysis.