Credited from: THEGUARDIAN
At the recent World Economic Forum in Davos, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte called for bolstered support from allies for Ukraine, emphasizing that "the frontline is moving in the wrong direction." He warned that a Russian victory would diminish the deterrent power of NATO, potentially costing "trillions" to restore credibility. "If Ukraine loses then to restore the deterrence of the rest of NATO again, it will be a much, much higher price," he stated, underscoring the urgency of the situation.
During the conference, Rutte highlighted the importance of the U.S. maintaining its military support for Ukraine, reiterating that Europe must assume a larger share of the financial burden in providing military aid. "If the U.S. keeps supplying arms to Ukraine," he argued, "it is only fair that Europe pays the highest burden." Rutte agreed with former U.S. President Donald Trump's assertion that Europe has been underspending on defense, which jeopardizes the transatlantic alliance's ability to respond to threats. Source.
In a parallel dialogue, Richard Grenell, U.S. envoy for special missions, echoed the need for NATO members to fulfill their financial commitments. He stated, "You cannot ask the American people to expand the umbrella of NATO when the current members aren’t paying their fair share," reinforcing the notion that current spending levels are inadequate for collective security. Many NATO members are expected to fall short of the alliance's goal of 2% of GDP in defense expenditures, and Grenell urged leaders to align spending with their commitments to NATO.
Rutte's remarks follow a concurrence among NATO leaders about the significant implications of a Russian triumph in Ukraine, with experts noting it could empower not just Russia, but its allies, including North Korea and Iran. "A bad end to the Russia-Ukraine war would lead to Vladimir Putin high-fiving with the leaders of North Korea, Iran, and China," Rutte cautioned.
As tensions escalate, European leaders voiced concerns about U.S. policy under Trump possibly favoring an expedited peace deal with Russia that could undermine Ukraine's position. The risk of perpetuating a false sense of security and failing to address underlying threats remains a significant concern for NATO members as they navigate this challenging geopolitical landscape. Source.
Key continental leaders, including those from Poland and Finland, are advocating for substantial military investments and sustainable strategies for NATO's forward posture in the event of a conflict escalation. Concerns about an ineffective peace deal, reminiscent of past agreements like Minsk in 2014, have fueled calls for appropriate preparations should dialogue yield unfavorable terms.
For more news updates, read the full articles on India Times, South China Morning Post, The Guardian, and Los Angeles Times.