The Fraternal Order of Police (FOP), the largest police union in the United States, has publicly condemned President Donald Trump for his recent pardons of individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol insurrection, calling it a move that sends a “dangerous message” regarding the treatment of crimes against law enforcement. The statement, issued jointly with the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP), follows Trump’s act of granting “full, complete and unconditional” pardons to over 1,500 individuals connected to the events of January 6, many of whom assaulted officers defending the Capitol.

In their statement, the unions expressed deep discouragement over these pardons, saying, “allowing those convicted of these crimes to be released early diminishes accountability and devalues the sacrifices made by courageous law enforcement officers and their families.” Furthermore, the statement emphasizes that when serious crimes go unpunished, it risks emboldening future violence against law enforcement. A staggering 150 officers from U.S. Capitol Police and D.C. police were injured during the riot, an incident that has resulted in nine deaths. Those pardoned include members of far-right extremist groups like the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers, some of whom were charged with more severe offenses such as seditious conspiracy.

Despite their previous endorsements of Trump in past elections, today's backlash indicates a significant shift in sentiment among police unions. GOP lawmakers have also expressed their discontent; Senator Lisa Murkowski stated, “I am disappointed to see that,” regarding the blanket pardons. Senator Thom Tillis noted that “you make this place less safe if you send the signal that police officers could potentially be assaulted and there is no consequence.”

Polling data reflects a broader public disapproval of the pardons. According to a recent NPR/PBS News/Marist poll, before Trump took office, approximately 60% of Americans disapproved of his decision to pardon those involved in the insurrection, revealing a strong sentiment across party lines against such amnesty. For many, this move contradicts his self-portrayal as a law-and-order candidate. This controversy may have implications not only for Trump but also for public trust in law enforcement as it questions the abandonment of accountability.

While Trump has defended his pardons by stating these individuals “have served years” in jail and suggesting that their life circumstances warrant clemency, the broader implications of this action continue to spark outrage. As the discussion around the pardons evolves, both the FOP and IACP emphasize the peril in devaluing the rule of law at a time when public safety is critically examined.

For more in-depth coverage of this breaking news, please visit The Guardian, Salon, and Newsweek.