Credited from: NEWSWEEK
In a dramatic turn of events, President Donald Trump signed an executive order on January 20, 2025, effectively pausing the enforcement of a federal ban on the popular social media app TikTok for 75 days. This decision comes just hours before the ban, enacted due to national security concerns involving its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, was set to take effect. The move creates a complicated political landscape as lawmakers and tech moguls examine the potential fate of the app.
With his recent executive order, Trump aims to allow time for a negotiation that could involve a U.S. ownership stake in TikTok. “I may not do the deal. I may do the deal. TikTok is worthless, worthless if I don’t approve it,” Business Insider reported Trump stating. In his remarks, Trump pushed for the U.S. to have half-ownership in a joint venture with TikTok, a position that has sparked interest from big names like Elon Musk and Larry Ellison.
Following the Supreme Court's recent upholding of the divest-or-ban law, which mandates ByteDance must sell TikTok's U.S. operations or cease its functions, TikTok briefly went dark on January 17 before reemerging under Trump's direct influence. The app, which boasts roughly 170 million U.S. users, faced complications when tech giants like Apple and Google removed it from their app stores in compliance with the ban, despite efforts from service providers like Oracle to restore operations.
Trump's assertion that TikTok could be worth "hundreds of billions of dollars" has raised eyebrows, with critics within his own party expressing their concern over national security risks that remain unresolved. Senators Tom Cotton and Pete Ricketts have voiced opposition to any extension of TikTok’s ban, citing legal requirements that must be fulfilled for the app to continue operating in the U.S.
As negotiations about TikTok unfold, Trump could encounter significant challenges. His administration’s proposals to broker a deal with ByteDance to ensure a U.S. ownership stake might face scrutiny from legal experts who argue it conflicts with laws passed by Congress. The Associated Press highlighted that Trump’s authority to pause the ban is ambiguous given the existing federal law, raising questions about potential challenges to his decisions.
Further complicating the situation is the increasing scrutiny of TikTok's content moderation practices. In light of various claims that TikTok censors anti-Trump content, observers are alert to how these practices may evolve under new management conditions.
As discussions continue in Washington and boardrooms across America, the future of TikTok hangs in the balance. Trump’s pivot from a strong stance against the app to protecting its operations in the U.S. underscores the complexities at the intersection of technology, social media, and national security in an increasingly charged political environment. "Every rich person has called me about TikTok," he remarked, indicating a broader interest in the potential acquisition of the platform.
For further developments on TikTok's future and Trump's evolving stance, refer to the comprehensive coverage provided by CNN.