In response to President Donald Trump's recent executive order (EO) titled "Protecting the meaning and value of American citizenship," immigrant rights advocates have swiftly filed a lawsuit in a U.S. district court. This EO, which denies automatic citizenship to children born in the U.S. under certain conditions, has raised significant concerns, especially among the Indian diaspora. The order specifies that children born after February 19, 2024, whose mothers are either 'unlawfully present' in the U.S. or 'lawfully but temporarily present' (such as on a visa) and whose fathers are neither U.S. citizens nor permanent residents (green card holders) will not automatically acquire U.S. citizenship at birth. This shift threatens to impact more than a million Indians currently in a lengthy green card queue as many of these families are hopeful that their U.S.-born children would eventually assist them in gaining residency.

The first lawsuit, filed in the District of New Hampshire, involves various advocacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Asian Law Caucus, challenging the constitutionality of the EO. They argue that birthright citizenship, which is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, should encompass all individuals born on American soil, barring a few exceptional cases involving diplomats. According to the ACLU, "Denying citizenship to U.S.-born children is not only unconstitutional — it’s also a reckless repudiation of American values.”

The executive order's language denotes that a child is not "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States if born to parents holding temporary visas, blurring the long-accepted interpretation of U.S. citizenship. Critics, including immigration attorney Ashwin Sharma, emphasize that this reinterpretation risks creating a permanent subclass of individuals denied their rights despite being born on U.S. soil. They assert that any child born to a parent who is legally present in the country should automatically be granted citizenship.

Aarti Kohli, director of the Asian Law Caucus, expressed concerns about the executive order's implications, stating, “For over a century, birthright citizenship has been a cornerstone of U.S. democracy.” This sentiment echoes across the immigrant community, which fears instability resulting from this new policy. Legal experts predict that the fight against the EO will escalate, citing significant constitutional grounds for challenge.

Greg Siskind, co-founder of an immigration law firm, stated that Trump's interpretation of the 14th Amendment could have profound implications, noting that “going forward, children of H-1B and H-4 non-immigrants who are born in the U.S. will not be recognized as U.S. citizens.” With various legal perspectives on its ramifications, this executive order is expected to face rigorous scrutiny in the courts.

As the legal battle unfolds, the future of hundreds of thousands of immigrant families hangs in the balance, emphasizing the ongoing tensions surrounding immigration policy in the United States. The question of citizenship established by birthright is now one of the most contested issues, pointing towards potential challenges ahead for those who seek to safeguard the rights encapsulated in the Constitution.
For further detailed analysis, you can check the complete articles from Times of India.