Credited from: THEHILL
Doug Burgum, former North Dakota governor and President-elect Donald Trump’s nominee for Interior Secretary, faced a largely cordial confirmation hearing before the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, where multiple issues regarding energy policy and climate change were raised. While the atmosphere lacked the normal tension seen in previous hearings, the Los Angeles Times reports that Burgum remains firm on Trump’s vision of achieving U.S. “energy dominance” through the promotion of fossil fuels, claiming it can counteract the power of autocratic nations like Russia and Venezuela, who have weaker environmental regulations.
Burgum’s assertions surrounding fossil fuels came amidst questions about renewable energy’s reliability. He voiced reservations about the continuity of power generation from sources like wind and solar, labeling them as “intermittent.” His responses to Senator Angus King (I-Maine) highlighted his belief in the need for “baseload” energy sources, such as coal, to keep pace with the country’s technological demands while staving off what he sees as a potential threat from China in the AI arms race. “Without baseload we’re going to lose the AI arms race to China,” he insisted.
Senator Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) sharply countered Burgum's stance, indicating that military leaders consider global warming to be a significant threat that can precipitate instability and conflict. Hirono expressed concern that increased reliance on fossil fuels would exacerbate climate issues rather than mitigate them. When pressed about whether he considers climate change a problem, Burgum confirmed it as a “global phenomenon” but appeared to prioritize fossil fuels in his energy strategy over renewable alternatives, a reflection of the The Hill's coverage.
The hearing also touched on the controversial subject of drilling in national monuments such as Bears Ears. Burgum committed to "follow the law" regarding such decisions but did not shy away from underlining his belief that not all federal lands need the same level of strict protection, hinting at a potential policy shift that leans towards utilizing those lands for economic purposes, including logging and oil production. He remarked, “Not every acre of federal land is a national park or a wilderness area,” suggesting a balance between conservation and resource extraction.
The Republican senators present largely supported Burgum, with committee chair Mike Lee (R-Utah) dismissing concerns about insufficient oil deposits in national monuments as “paranoid fantasy.” However, conservation groups expressed routine opposition, criticizing Burgum’s commitment to continued fossil fuel exploration as contrary to environmental interests and sustainability.
Burgum's background as a wealthy entrepreneur from North Dakota positions him as a significant player in the debate over the future of energy in the U.S. His administration could very well endeavor to pivot American policy from the current *Biden administration's* environmental directives towards a focus on expanded fossil fuel development, aligned with Trump's previous promises to increase domestic oil production. As the Senate prepares for a likely swift confirmation process, the ramifications of Burgum's appointment loom large over the stewardship of America’s vast public lands and resources.
For more details about Burgum's hearing and environmental discussions, refer to the full articles by the Los Angeles Times and The Hill.