MANCHESTER, England — The family of the late Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha, former owner of Leicester City Football Club, has filed a monumental $2.6 billion lawsuit against Italian defense contractor Leonardo S.p.A. in what is now regarded as the largest fatal accident claim in English legal history.

The claim, initiated in London's High Court, seeks compensation for loss of earnings and other damages following the tragic helicopter crash that claimed Vichai and four others just outside the King Power Stadium in October 2018. "My family feels the loss of my father as much today as we ever have done," remarked his son, Aiyawatt, who accuses Leonardo of failing to meet safety standards and thus being responsible for his father’s untimely death. "I hold them wholly responsible for his death."

The Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) of the British government reported that a failure of the helicopter's tail rotor was to blame, reaching approximately 430 feet before descending rapidly. This report ruled out human error, placing the responsibility squarely on the equipment used, notably the AW169 helicopter manufactured by Leonardo.

In its defense, Leonardo expressed "deepest sympathy" for the victims, while maintaining that it had complied with all regulatory requirements and safety standards relevant to the AW169. A company spokesperson emphasized that they are dedicated to defending against the claims through their legal advisers and insurers. They stated, "Leonardo finds it essential to reiterate that the AAIB found no faults in either the design or manufacture of the helicopter."

This claim also highlights the financial repercussions for King Power, the company founded by Vichai, estimated to be earning over £2.5 billion annually before his death.

The family’s legal team pointed to the AAIB’s report as a "damning" indictment of safety practices and a crucial foundation for their claim, which demands accountability for the fatal accident that has left a lasting mark on their lives.

As legal proceedings unfold, this case has spotlighted both the tragic loss of life and broader implications regarding air safety and corporate responsibility within the aviation industry.