Credited from: THEHILL
Former Congressman George Santos is leveraging his new podcast, Pants on Fire, to secure additional time to pay off over $580,000 in court fines resulting from his fraud and identity theft convictions. Santos was originally scheduled for sentencing on February 7, but a New York federal judge has agreed to postpone it to April 25, marking a partial concession to Santos’s request for a delay.
The case against Santos has been fraught with controversy since he was expelled from Congress in late 2023 following revelations of his deceptive campaign tactics, which included falsifying donor identities. His plea agreement necessitates a payment of $375,000 in restitution and $205,000 in forfeiture—amounts he argued would be manageable through upcoming podcast revenues.
In court filings, Santos's attorneys asserted that he needs more time to monetize his podcast to meet these financial obligations, describing it as a "promising revenue stream." However, this claim has been met with skepticism by prosecutors, who have contended that Santos's financial prospects are largely "speculative."
U.S. District Judge Joanna Seybert described the delay as a "one-time courtesy,” emphasizing that since his plea, Santos has not made any payments toward his owed amounts. They highlighted that Santos has considerable financial avenues already available to him, reportedly earning over $800,000 from projects including Cameo and a documentary since his ousting, yet he claims to only have $1,000 in liquid assets.
Critical voices have pointed out that granting Santos time to generate revenue through podcasting could send a troubling message about accountability in the justice system. As noted by prosecutors, this could inadvertently reward individuals who exploit crime for notoriety.
The upcoming sentencing will mark a significant chapter in Santos's dramatic downfall from a rising political figure to a convicted felon, significantly impacting the perception of ethics and transparency within political campaigning. Santos, who admitted to duping voters and misusing campaign funds, faces a maximum of 22 years in prison, despite his plea deal typically resulting in a recommended sentence of 75 to 87 months.
For more details, visit The Hill, The Daily Beast, ABC News, and Reuters.